In the pantheon of contemporary literature, few works so audaciously meld verisimilitude with the grotesque as Mark McIntyre’s The Corporation v The Dragon. This text, a satirical exegesis of corporate malfeasance, demands scrutiny not merely for its narrative bravura but for its profound philosophical underpinnings. With solemnity befitting its gravitas, this review elucidates three cardinal aspects: its foundation in an authentic chronicle, the axiomatic principles of resolute opposition, and the pervasive human aversion to such defiance, all ensconced within a framework of absurdity that amplifies its existential import.
A Veridical Genesis of The Corporation v The Dragon: The Ontological Anchor.
At its inception, The Corporation v The Dragon eschews the realm of mere fabulation, rooting itself in a substratum of historical veracity. Approximately fifty per cent of its narrative derives from tangible events—a statistic that imbues the text with an epistemic heft rarely encountered in satirical discourse. McIntyre explicates this foundation thus: “This narrative draws inspiration from the events surrounding the book Sandy the Dragon, an innovative work designed to be accessible to all, including the deaf and blind” (p. 206). Herein lies a paradox: a charitable institution, ostensibly dedicated to ameliorating the plight of the marginalized, endeavours to suppress a creation aligned with its own mission. This incongruity, documented with chilling precision, lends the work a documentary gravitas, transforming it into a mirror of societal dysfunction. The absurdity of such repression, wherein a benevolent artefact becomes an existential threat, underscores a truth more disquieting than fiction: reality often surpasses the imagination in its capacity for irrationality.
The Principia of Resistance: A Stand Against the Void
Central to the text’s intellectual architecture is the delineation of resistance as an ontological imperative. The protagonist, Mark, emerges as an archetype of steadfast rectitude, confronting the monolithic edifice of The Corporation with a resolve that transcends mere pragmatism. His rejoinder to bureaucratic tyranny is a testament to this ethos: “Safeguarding what, exactly? The idea that Storyteller can achieve something meaningful? The concept of fairness? Or are we safeguarding The Corporation’s fragile sense of control?” (p. 44-45). This rhetorical salvo is not a mere polemic but a metaphysical assertion—an affirmation that justice, as a categorical imperative, necessitates confrontation with oppressive hegemonies.
Yet, this stand is not without its eschatological resonance. The text posits that resistance, epitomized by Mark’s defiance and Sandy’s incendiary retribution—“Sandy… with a mighty dragon breath, he incinerated the entire building” (p. 157), is a redemptive act, purging the detritus of corruption to unveil a nascent order. The absurdity of a dragon as justice’s instrument serves not to diminish but to elevate this principle, rendering it a mythic archetype: the oppressed, through resolute action, reclaim agency from the abyss.
The Reluctance to Oppose: An Anthropological Inquiry
Concomitant with this valorization of resistance is an incisive exploration of why humanity so often recoils from such a stance. The Corporation, presided over by the paradigmatically obtuse Dick and his coterie of “senior managers all thick as two short planks” (to borrow a vernacular phrase), exemplifies a systemic inertia that stifles dissent. McIntyre articulates this reticence with sobering clarity: “Doing the right thing means standing apart. It means risking something. And people are scared of that” (p. 159). Herein lies the anthropological crux: the fear of ostracism, the dread of reprisal, and the seductive comfort of conformity conspire to paralyze the individual will.
This aversion is not merely pragmatic but existential, an abdication of moral autonomy in favor of a soporific acquiescence. The text’s Human Resources apparatus, a literal nightmare of “long, talon-like nails” and “pitch-black eyes glinting” (p. 64), embodies this terror-inducing coercion: “HR, in their almost finite wisdom, declared that Sandy the Dragon… was a safeguarding issue” (p. 30). The slapstick ineptitude of the hitman, astride “a very old, very rusty, absolutely not roadworthy bicycle” (p. 96), further amplifies this theme, his bumbling descent into bins and bushes mirrors the futility of resistance thwarted by cowardice or incompetence. Yet, his hinted redemption suggests a latent potential for transcendence, should one muster the fortitude to defy.
Justice Wrapped in Absurdity: A Dialectical Synthesis
The confluence of these themes—veracity, resistance, and reluctance—finds its apotheosis in the text’s absurdist veneer, a dialectical synthesis that elevates its jurisprudential discourse. McIntyre asserts: “The Corporation believed they could manipulate the narrative to their advantage, but Mark demonstrated that truth is the most potent weapon one can wield” (p. 204). This aphorism encapsulates the work’s moral teleology: justice, though cloaked in the ludicrous, a dragon’s flame, a hitman’s pratfalls, emerges as an inexorable force, dismantling the edifices of falsehood.
The absurdity serves not as a distraction but as a hermeneutic lens, illuminating the grotesque incongruities of a world wherein benevolence is proscribed and incompetence reigns. It is a profound commentary on the human condition: that truth, however obscured by the risible, retains an intrinsic potency to redress inequity. The hitman’s retreat to an ideated haven, perhaps to ponder amidst cognitively superior company, subtly intimates that even within absurdity lies the seed of moral awakening.
Conclusion: A Work of Transcendent Import
The Corporation v The Dragon stands as a monument to intellectual rigour, a text wherein the veridical and the absurd converge to interrogate the principles of justice and resistance. Its nightmarish depiction of HR, its slapstick evocation of folly, and its solemn call to stand resolute against tyranny constitute a triadic edifice of unparalleled profundity. For the discerning reader, it is an imperative engagement—a disquisition that demands contemplation with the utmost gravity, lest we succumb to the somnolent tyranny of our own making. In its pages, McIntyre offers not merely a narrative but a philosophical mandate: to wield truth as a weapon, to stand apart, and to prevail.
Moreover, readers may claim their own dragon through McIntyre’s companion work, Sandy The Dragon - Guide to Advocacy Rights and Justice. This advocacy guide, a pragmatic codicil to the narrative, equips individuals in care environments and their advocates with the juridical tools to assert their rights, an erudite manual that transmutes the text’s themes into actionable praxis. It is a commendable endeavour, extending the work’s ethos of resistance into the tangible realm of justice-seeking.
You can read this book for free on kinde.
The Dragon series The expose of a dragon that did!
In care, or know someone who is? Rights in law!
The book they tried to ban! Told you it was true!
Commentaires